Let’s start with the opening sequences. The opening
sequences often have multiple imagery that imply that you are watching the news
as it happens, such as the “Ticking clocks”. To show that the news is worldwide,
they also often use iconography that represents places from different
countries, such as big Ben, the tajmahal, and similar other things. The same
effect can be done by showing the globe, which is done in several intros such
as the BBC news intro. The intro, and at parts the set itself also end up
having a glass like design, further representing the fact it should be a
“Window on the world”
However, the sets does have some issues with displaying this imagery
in my opinion. The reason for this is that at times, or at least on some intros
of the news, you end up seeing the equipment in the background, seeming like
there is more work being done in the background than just showing us what is
there, also adding the realism of the news broadcast a bit.
The presenters (Also known as Studio news readers) often have
to be non-biased in their opinion while on screen. The reason for this is
because of the “Impartiality laws”, which I will explain in a bit. Though, it
does end up further strengthening its claim as the “Window on the world” There
are also field reporters, which give us a view of the event where It is, most
of the time at least. When they are on the field two things often occur, they
are often seen interviewing people on the scene, and there is a link to the
studio, so they have a method of doing live recordings, which is mainly for
major events, such as bombings, Major global events, and several other aspects.
There is also another thing that also is done by the studio news readers. They
have a specific mode of addressing to viewers. They often are seen facing the camera
at eye level, as if talking to them directly, this is to enhance the realism,
and make it seem like they are talking to the viewer (you)
There are a few rules that have to be maintained in
news reporting. There are seven main Laws, and two key regulatory bodies. The
Laws (Which I have taken from the Btec Media blog, more due to fact the
following being facts) are the impartiality laws, which says “ITV news will
show due impartiality” the BBC Royal charter which says “The corporation shall
refrain from expressing its vies on matters of public concern”, The Official
secrets act, which prevents broadcast or publication of material deemed to be
detrimental to the security of the nation.
Then there is the Prevention of terrorism act, which prevents
the broadcast of material likely to promote terrorist organizations or causes,
The Libel laws which prevent the publication or broadcast of any unfounded
accusations, the sub-judicy laws, which prevent publication or broad cast of
anything to do with ongoing court cases which may influence the jury, and the D
notices, in which defense notices may be issued by a committee consisting of
members of the ministry of defense, the military and the media, where the
government think that to publish or broadcast information will be detrimental
to British defense interests.
The news selection process is a bit strange, considering if
id doesn’t hit any one of several key points, it is thrown into the “Dust bin
of history”, These key points can include stuff such as “How often does this
event happen?”, “How it affects people” and “Are elite people affected (VIPs)”.
This process is essentially made by using “Galtung and Ruge’s study of news
values” Which still holds true today. These news values end up making a minor
bias, since they really priorities stuff that don’t affect the general area, if
its local news, the exact opposite occurs if it’s global.
The process of making a news story can be considered long,
since it takes a day to really set it up. The process often starts from around
10 am, and finishes just before 10pm, so that any last minute changes can occur
if needed if a breaking story occurs. During the day, they start off with a
time table for the news broadcast, including what camera angles, what clips,
and so forth to use. All these end up making it seem realistic, though that can
be put under subjectivity, considering mistakes can happen on air that make it
seem like you are watching a blooper reel of a TV show.
All these points end up showing that the creation of a
news report is not really a “window” to the world, since everything is modified
to show us what they want us to see. Nothing more than that. It doesn’t really
change much about it though, since it is just following something we have seen
over and over again, only when they do something that seems off, we only notice
the realism break, and even then, it’s only temporary, meaning there is not much
we can do to change it. The news is still accurate, so why change it?
Now, there are also alternative methods of getting news. By
using Social media networks such as face book, twitter and several other
things, it is possible for News teams to get news faster, and cheaper. It also
allows for them to get send out people quickly to clarify these events, since I
doubt that the limited amount of characters from twitter would help much. It
does however help relay people’s reactions to the public from events such as
the Boston marathon bombing and also any other key events. These feats are made
easier due to upgraded technology. Both, ranging from better handheld recording
equipment to smart phones ended up helping record major events and spreading
the word about these events. This does end up showing a more realistic feel,
since it can show it as if you were recording it yourself, or even if you are
there. You can visualise the voices from the “text speak” from those who were
there, helping keep the “Window of the world” objective the news attempts to
keep.
No comments:
Post a Comment